Exit Strategy

Knowing The Motivations Behind Your Exit Strategy

September 5, 2019 By admin

The M&A process is only half the story when guiding a client to exit. This is one of the great lessons Dr. John Binkley’s decades at Generational Equity has taught him. What often goes underappreciated is the emotional aspect of an exit strategy.

What does Dr. Binkley mean by this? Well, when you dedicate years to nurturing your business, especially if you started from the ground up or it has been in your family for generations, making the decision to exit can be incredibly difficult.

The timing might be perfect, the offer could be ideal, the buyer the right fit… but you still find yourself not ready to let go.

Dr. Binkley’s son Ryan explored the emotional journey to selling a business in a recent article on LinkedIn, which covers this experience in greater depth. With many years working in the M&A industry behind them, they’re familiar with phrases from business owners such as:

“I’m just not ready to exit.”
“I will miss my employees.”
“I have no hobbies or interests outside of the business.”
“I am worried about the legacy I am leaving behind.”
“No one can run the business as well as I do.”
“What am I going to do when I leave?”

The final statement has been highlighted as it leads to the subject of this piece: knowing your motivation behind your exit strategy.

Understanding Your Incentive to Exit Your Business

Most people exit their business with a motivation in mind, whether it’s an offer too good to refuse, they’ve taken their company as far as it will go, or they’re ready to retire and take back time for themselves.

However, that motivation to exit can easily find itself buried under the emotions that can hinder any sale – the doubt, the grief, the fear. In Dr. Binkley’s experience, losing sight of this reasoning can make it more likely for sales to fall apart at the 11^th hour and you potentially walk away from an optimal deal.

What is the consequence of this? Not only do you lose out on the time and resources you’ve devoted to valuing your company, sourcing a buyer and negotiating this deal, but it can also lead to greater issues later on, including:

A host of confidentiality issues between you and the other party, which may lead to legal difficulties
Issues forming between your loved ones, employees and partners over the uncertainty surrounding your business
You develop a negative reputation among potential buyers, who will be more apprehensive about entering negotiations with you when you next decide to exit, likely hurting the value you receive

Furthermore, holding off on exiting because you are unclear regarding your personal motivations means you may one day find yourself forced to sell. Dr. Binkley often says there are two types of business owners:

Those that PLAN to sell
Those that HAVE to sell

It is far more beneficial to find yourself in the former group than the latter. So it is essential to make sure you’re mentally ready to exit early in your journey to keep you on course for a well-planned, successful outcome.

What is Your Reason to Sell?

As alluded to earlier, there are a host of reasons why you might be motivated to exit your business. But how do you find yours? Obviously, the answer to that can only come from you and your inner circle, but addressing this should take time and plenty of thought.

A decision of this magnitude should not be taken lightly, especially if you hope to achieve the optimal exit strategy. Rash decisions are the ones most likely to be reconsidered down the road, so it should take a lot of rationalizing and deliberation both internally and with those closest to you, be it your family, other shareholders or trusted advisors.

Indeed, talking to an experienced M&A advisor can be a huge help in reinforcing your motivations to exit. At Generational Equity, Dr. John Binkley places a strong emphasis on dealmakers getting to know their clients closely, understanding their background, needs and ambitions before proceeding any further in the process.

This focus has helped many of Generational’s clients understand their incentive to exit their business in pursuit of the maximum value. No two clients’ goals are exactly the same, which is why it’s crucial to work with an M&A professional that treats you as an individual, rather than taking a cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all approach.

If finding and sticking to your motivations to exit are proving difficult, Dr. Binkley would like to share some of these clients’ stories, helping you understand:

How diverse reasons for exiting a business can be; and
How working with a professional keeps those motivations top of the agenda throughout the journey to exit.

Security for the Future – Mike Aman

*“I would have been doing my wife and my children a disservice had I not had a plan in place for when the time came for me to sell the business.”*

We can’t predict the future. For Mike Aman, it took a wake-up call to fully appreciate this when a close friend suffered an unexpected stroke. Mike used this as motivation to talk to his family and reach the conclusion that selling his business in order to secure their financial future, so they were ready for any eventuality.

Freedom to Explore – Bobby & Stacy Evans

*“My wife and I love to travel, and we’ve got the time available to us now to be able to do more travelling than we have in the past.”*

Being tied to their company restricted the time Bobby and Stacy Evans had to travel and experience different cultures. This vision was a big motivator for them in their exit strategy, giving them the time, resources and freedom to spread their wings and journey around the world.

Explore Your Passions – Tommy Barker

*“I learned in business that time is money. I’ve changed this in the time since I’ve sold my company – right now time is more valuable than money.”*

When you’re a serious business owner, your other passions often take a backseat. When the time was right, Tommy Barker decided he was ready to dedicate more time to his love of restoring classic muscle cars. This motivation carried him through the process, keeping him on the road to his optimal exit.

Partner for Growth – Debbie Ritchey

*“You’ve really got to ask yourself do I want to just get out, or do I want somebody that has the capital that I don’t to grow this thing?”*

Sometimes exiting the business outright isn’t the motivation, but instead selling part of it to a partner to help it continue to grow. That was the case for Debbie Ritchey, who sought out an investor to support her company’s development, with the goal of reaching its full potential.

Enjoy Retirement – Michael & Rebecca Baker

*“We wanted to get out while we could still walk and still enjoy, have time to play with the kids and not have to worry about things*.”

Often, the goal of an exit strategy is to reap the rewards following years of hard work and perseverance. Having taken their company as far as they could, Michael and Rebecca Baker’s motivation changed to selling for the maximum value, giving them the freedom to enjoy life on their terms.

Finding Your Motivation to Exit

Dr. Binkley hopes this dive into the importance of keeping your motivations for exiting in the forefront of your mind has proved useful, as well as the stories of real business owners’ exit journeys. The psychological side of selling a business is in many ways just as important as the steps to achieving a deal, so it is important to take this into consideration.

Again, how your M&A advisor approaches the emotional aspect of the exit planning process should be a key consideration in who you work with. Make sure you choose an individual or team that prioritizes your goals as much as you do, helping these stay fresh in your thoughts during the difficult moments along the way to your exit.

You can discover more about both the psychological and practical aspects of exiting a business in many of Generational Equity’s in-depth insights. Alternatively, explore Dr. John Binkley’s blog for more articles on M&A, business, ministry, and more.

Cross-Sector M&A and the Blurring Business Landscape

April 30, 2019 By admin

“We are seeing M&A become the fastest route to reinvention in today’s digital economy.” – How U.S. M&A will transform businesses in a changing world, Ernst & Young

As Dr. John Binkley and the team at Generational Equity have noted on numerous occasions, we are enjoying one of the most robust seller’s markets in decades. U.S. M&A in 2018 ended on a high note, with deal value topping $2 trillion for the fourth consecutive year across North America, marking a 6.9% increase on 2017.

This trend shows no sign of slowing into 2019 either. Insight from Merrill Corporation on Mergermarket data demonstrates that the pace of deal making has actually picked up in the early months of this year, with 504 deals valued at $257.5 billion, eclipsing 2018’s $223.2 billion. This indicates to Dr. Binkley that the seller’s market is not over yet and buyers are doubling down on their efforts to secure fitting acquisitions.

But, what many business owners often don’t recognize is that the buyer who stands to offer the best deal might not necessarily be in the same industry as they are. Within the last few years there’s been an increase in attention to cross-sector deals, as businesses use M&A to expand in new markets, incorporate technology and grow their capabilities.

The rise of cross-industry M&A

Dr. John Binkley alluded to the increasing focus on cross-industry acquisitions in his article last year reviewing 2018’s M&A activity. This trend is expected by many to maintain in 2019, driven in large part by the desire of companies to integrate new technology in this rapidly digitalized world.

This point is explored in Ernst & Young’s 2019 sector outlook for M&A. They note how buyers, particularly private equity firms, are acquiring technology companies as bolt-ons for their existing platforms to improve their capabilities and remain competitive in an ever-shifting business landscape.

Rather than devote the substantial time, manpower and resources into developing their own technology in-house, it is often more time-efficient and cost-effective for buyers to acquire a company that already has the technology and specialist expertise to enhance their own offering.

In their full-year 2018 update of global M&A, PwC reinforces EY’s assertions that cross-sector deals were a pivotal part of that year’s activity, and will continue to be so this year. They revealed that over a third of U.S. corporate deals last year blurred sector lines, with this type of acquisition particularly prevalent among buyers in the media, telecom, pharmaceutical and life sciences industries.

Investment into technology companies is especially prevalent, as companies in traditionally non-tech sectors are now employing these to solve internal gaps, enhance their offerings to customers and remain competitive in a rapidly tech-reliant world.

451 Research revealed that acquirers outside the technology sphere have spent over $40 billion on tech companies in each of the last three years, a sign of the recent shift towards cross-sector M&A. And technology companies are also not shy of extending their reach into different industries, as demonstrated by Intel’s acquisition of Mobileye in an effort to become prevalent in the assisted and connected car industry.

However, the propensity to cross industry lines certainly isn’t exclusive to these sectors. KPMG conducted a thorough examination last year on the surge of cross-sector M&A in acquiring financial services companies. Their research clearly demonstrated the breadth of interest across industries in converging into this already broad sector:

Estimated share of sectors investing in financial services

Construction & Real Estate – 16%
Technology – 14.8%
Industrial – 13.6%
Energy – 11.8%
Consumer Goods/Retail – 10.1%
Transportation – 8.9%
Leisure – 5.9%
Media/Telecom – 5.3%
Healthcare – 4.7%
Others – 8.9%

For Dr. Binkley, this shows that the cross-sector M&A trend is not limited to one area or a passing fad in deal making – it is a signal of a more fluid business landscape. Companies that are seeking quick, meaningful growth are looking at opportunities to expand their capabilities and market share by looking beyond the bounds of their industry.

Don’t place industry limits on your exit strategy

A common thread connecting business owners that Dr. John Binkley and dealmakers at Generational Equity have noted over the years is the assumption that they will eventually sell their company to a competitor, or at least someone in the same industry. While that is certainly an option, by assuming this, you could place unnecessary limits on your options when pursuing an exit for optimal value.

That’s the difference between choosing an M&A firm that specializes in multiple sectors like Generational over boutique brokers. While boutique firms may claim to be able to help you find the optimal deal within your industry, that may not necessarily be the same as the optimal deal overall. It pays to explore all avenues and expand your horizons beyond the sector you operate in, as they could provide a more lucrative, synergistic and inviting proposition for the future of your company.

In 2017 Bloomberg supplied a list of cross-sector M&A deals that demonstrated how U.S. companies are looking outside their wheelhouse for new opportunities:

Source: Bloomberg

Each was a strategic decision to look towards an industry that is complementary to the acquiring company’s, but you must assume that the dealmakers involved took the time to scour the market and employed their cross-industry knowledge to find the optimal buyer for their clients.

Some of you may say “Why would a technology company be interested in my brick and mortar business?” But that’s not thinking like a buyer. Buyers look for intangible assets that don’t appear on the balance sheet, or ways your company can enhance their existing proposition, creating the proverbial 2 + 2 = 8 scenario.

In the end, your competitor may prove to be your optimal buyer. However, until you’ve explored the possibilities, you could be left wondering whether you left money on the table by sticking rigidly to the ever-reducing boundaries between industries.

The business landscape is changing, which Dr. Binkley credits in large part to the transformative possibilities presented by M&A activity in allowing firms to acquire technology, skilled personnel and new methodologies to increase their capabilities and remain competitive. The once-distinct divides between industries don’t exist anymore, and with that comes a whole new world of opportunity for exiting business owners to secure the maximum value.

Generational Equity’s diverse database of tens of thousands of business buyers allows the firm to present clients with in-depth expertise across a range of sectors, which has led to numerous examples of cross-sector pollination. By establishing a broad yet specialist approach to M&A, Dr. Binkley believes Generational presents all available options to middle market business owners preparing to exit.

Hopefully this has offered a greater insight into the prevalence of cross-sector M&A right now, the opportunities this offers for both professional buyers and those looking to exit, and the reasons why this environment makes choosing a firm that gives you options preferable when it comes to departing your business.

If you’d like to learn more about the current M&A landscape, cross-sector trends and the process of exiting a company for an optimal value, Generational Equity’s regularly updated insight page is a great resource for business owners thinking about their future.

In addition, Dr. John Binkley’s blog has several articles on developing your exit strategy, as well as other inspiring and motivational pieces.

Increase in PE-Backed Companies Seeking Add-ons Could Maximize Your Exit

September 20, 2018 By admin

With his extensive experience in the industry, Dr. John Binkley has seen trends and movements come and go within the U.S. financial landscape. One current phenomenon that he has observed with interest is the popularity of additive deal making, or “add-on” acquisitions, among middle market businesses by private equity firms.

While Dr. John Binkley and other professionals at Generational Equity have observed and commented upon the increase of add-on acquisitions in recent articles on the subject, the latest evidence shows that this trend has escalated significantly.

Add-ons Becoming Another Norm

Newly emerging figures are suggesting that additive deal making on behalf of private equity funds is no longer simply a significant contributor to the volume of U.S. middle market M&A activity, but that add-ons have become the primary means by which mid-size American businesses are now acquired.

According to PitchBook, compared to 15 years ago when less than 20% of buyouts globally were add-ons, so far this year they account for more than half, with this figure breaching two-thirds in the U.S. So, for a U.S. middle market business owner exiting their company this year, there is a significant chance the buyer will be a private equity firm aiming to bolt on the business to an already held platform company.

This clearly has huge implications for business owners picturing how they will one day exit their company. Given this shift in how and why middle market firms are acquired in the U.S., sellers will have to plan differently and look beyond their competitors as potential buyers.

For business owners with a limited understanding of the behavior of private equity funds, and the increasing complexity of exit transactions where private equity is involved, seeking professional advice on exit planning is now more essential than it has ever been.

The Traditional Model

When we consider M&A activity, we typically envision the situation where existing businesses expand their own operations on the ground by buying up competitors and associated businesses. The appeal of acquisitions to an operating business are quite clear:

Acqui-hiring: Recruitment can be costly and time consuming for businesses. By acquiring an associated business, the buyer effectively hires that company’s core of trained employees that are more prepared to hit the ground running.
Geographical expansion: Acquiring a business with a strong record in a target location can be a great way for a company to expand its reach while minimizing risk.
Economies of scale: Operating on a larger scale can deliver savings through the consolidation of job roles, and bulk buying of raw materials, wholesale items or goods not for resale and other such economies.
Diversification: By acquiring a business with a different focus from the buyer’s own, the buyer can introduce new functions onto their existing holdings immediately.
Supply chain: Acquiring a business that supplies yours, or even acquiring one that your business supplies, can cut costs or increase margins for the resulting entity.
Consolidation and alleviating risk: A consolidated business may have more capacity to take on larger contracts with larger partners. Such a business might also be offered some measure of stability and protection should they lose a key business partner.

In other words, good old-fashioned growth. You buy another business similar to your own to expand your operations, or an associated or disparate business to acquire new functions or capabilities. That much is clear. However, the market share represented by this traditional model is dwindling.

Same Game, New Players

This is despite the clear benefits of the approach and the fact that M&A activity is thriving. In fact, according to Deloitte:

“[A]bout 68 percent of executives at U.S. headquartered corporations and 76 percent of leaders at domestic based private equity firms say deal flow will increase in the next 12 months.”

However, rather than businesses buying other businesses, Dr. John Binkley has seen the M&A landscape shift with the rise of acquisitions through private equity funding. It may come as a surprise to many that private equity investment is now rivalling this traditional model in driving M&A. So, what has changed in terms of market benefits that a smaller percentage of acquisitions now stem from the corporate sector?

In an important sense, nothing has changed in the way that businesses benefit from consolidation. All the above benefits to expansion certainly still apply. These deals are still happening – and at record volumes – for the same reasons and achieving the same beneficial outcomes as they always have. All that has changed is the players involved. The difference lies in who is spotting the opportunities and building the deals.

What has occurred in the last decade is that the success and profitability in middle market M&A activity has attracted the attention of the substantial private equity funding that currently covers the market. Now, the players bolting these companies together are sophisticated “big picture” finance professionals who always have financial outcomes in sight – generating the maximum ongoing returns or divesting with the greatest profit.

What is in it for Private Equity?

But don’t these funds exist to dip in and out of industries, buying low and selling high? What interest would they have in buying a business as an add-on to another business that they have already acquired?

On the face of it, developing businesses with add-on acquisitions is the interventionist, labor-intensive, time-consuming activity you might not expect from private finance. However, where the returns justify it, PE has proved itself willing to roll up its sleeves and get involved.

According to an analyst note published earlier this year by PitchBook, the proportion of businesses held by private equity firms that have undertaken at least one add-on acquisition has increased from less than 20% in the early 2000s to over 30% in the first half of this year.

And the results for PE have been rewarding. Funds with a high proportion of add-on holdings have been posting greater returns than those with fewer such holdings. According to PitchBook, the two sample sets of add-on heavy funds that they analyzed demonstrated greater total value to paid-in ratios than less add-on loaded samples. The PitchBook report goes on to conclude that:

“36.3% of add-on funds beat the top-quartile hurdle rate, while just 10.0% of funds fell into the bottom-quartile, indicating that funds that employ the buy-and-build strategy generate superior returns.” Additive Dealmaking: Part II – An analysis of add-ons’ effect on fund performance PitchBook

So, with add-on heavy funds outperforming those with fewer add-ons, why wouldn’t PE pursue this buy-and-build policy through additive deal making? Over 25% of private equity add-on acquisitions are undertaken by funds that had already completed at least 5 add-on deals previously – demonstrating that those funds’ successes in pursuing buy-and-build made it worth their while to repeat the policy on multiple occasions.

Private Equity Influx Changing the Complexion of the M&A Market

With his vast experience in the industry, Dr. John Binkley interprets this move towards private equity add-on purchases as a culture shift within the industry that has been in the works for some time. Brokering business sales is no longer a matter between fellow business owners. The days of the business owner bowing out while negotiating a mutually beneficial deal with a local competitor are disappearing.

The current booming seller’s market remains a huge opportunity for sellers. The reason PE firms are clamoring after the American middle market is because it is so attractive and profitable to them right now. This level of demand can mean business sellers are in a position to realize extremely favorable valuations on their businesses, exiting with higher sums than they ever thought possible – but only with professional advice to match the shrewd business strategies of this professional buyer.

If you are a middle market business owner, exit planning warrants serious consideration. But without an understanding of your prospective buyer, that planning will be of little use. As we have seen, it is increasingly likely that your buyer will come from the private equity sector, and most business owners can be forgiven for having a limited understanding of how that sector operates.

Learning about the profile of your buyers is just one of the areas covered in Generational Equity’s complimentary conference – so arranging to attend could be a very wise move given the shifting complexion of the M&A market.